<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Kubla Central - Earth Moving]]></title>
		<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Kubla Central - https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Accounting for differing grades around retaining walls]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=6935</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=2841">Ken S</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=6935</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Something I've had issues with while using the software is accounting for cuts and fills on either side of a retaining wall. In some cases the grade on one side of the wall may differ by up to 18' and I cannot seem to find a good method for translating that to the program. I've tried various methods of creating the retaining wall as a feature surface, as a 1' wide path and even using the raise feature. Even playing with the side batter numbers the program seems to always leave a ditch on the higher side of the retaining wall that is difficult to calculate a cut or fill for. When trying it as a feature surface, using an outline of "Define Varying Levels" seems to do the best job as I can set the grade on the high side and the low side separately but the program still leaves a space unaccounted for. Setting the wall as a break line inside of another feature, i.e., a sub grade in a grass area, also seems to make the grades around the break line go bonkers. One thing I've been able to do about that is set point elevations in the areas that are causing trouble but most of the time I am just making an educated guess at those point elevations and the problem still remains.<br />
<br />
I'm curious if others have had this issue and what they've done to combat it. Or maybe there is something in the program that I'm missing that would better account for the placement of a proposed retaining wall. If the "Path" feature allowed me to set differing elevations on either side of the wall, and also account for proposed contour lines, I feel like it would be a good solution for the problem I'm having here. One thing to note is that I do not have access to CAD files when I'm creating my models, so I'm doing this purely based on the information provided in the plans available for a specific job which are sometimes not the best.<br />
<br />
I've attached an example of a job where I was having this issue for folks to review and possibly advise. One factor I am unsure of on this particular job is if there is any sort of reveal on the high side of the retaining wall at any point. Typically I would have to wait to win the bid for the job and obtain a shop drawing from my wall subcontractor before I have specific information on these things.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/images/attachtypes/" title="Kubla Cubed File" border="0" alt=".kcp" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=149" target="_blank" title="">Cuts Fills V2.kcp</a> (Size: 1.95 MB / Downloads: 4)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Something I've had issues with while using the software is accounting for cuts and fills on either side of a retaining wall. In some cases the grade on one side of the wall may differ by up to 18' and I cannot seem to find a good method for translating that to the program. I've tried various methods of creating the retaining wall as a feature surface, as a 1' wide path and even using the raise feature. Even playing with the side batter numbers the program seems to always leave a ditch on the higher side of the retaining wall that is difficult to calculate a cut or fill for. When trying it as a feature surface, using an outline of "Define Varying Levels" seems to do the best job as I can set the grade on the high side and the low side separately but the program still leaves a space unaccounted for. Setting the wall as a break line inside of another feature, i.e., a sub grade in a grass area, also seems to make the grades around the break line go bonkers. One thing I've been able to do about that is set point elevations in the areas that are causing trouble but most of the time I am just making an educated guess at those point elevations and the problem still remains.<br />
<br />
I'm curious if others have had this issue and what they've done to combat it. Or maybe there is something in the program that I'm missing that would better account for the placement of a proposed retaining wall. If the "Path" feature allowed me to set differing elevations on either side of the wall, and also account for proposed contour lines, I feel like it would be a good solution for the problem I'm having here. One thing to note is that I do not have access to CAD files when I'm creating my models, so I'm doing this purely based on the information provided in the plans available for a specific job which are sometimes not the best.<br />
<br />
I've attached an example of a job where I was having this issue for folks to review and possibly advise. One factor I am unsure of on this particular job is if there is any sort of reveal on the high side of the retaining wall at any point. Typically I would have to wait to win the bid for the job and obtain a shop drawing from my wall subcontractor before I have specific information on these things.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/images/attachtypes/" title="Kubla Cubed File" border="0" alt=".kcp" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=149" target="_blank" title="">Cuts Fills V2.kcp</a> (Size: 1.95 MB / Downloads: 4)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Extracting Commencement and Final elevation for Consultant's Manual checking]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=6485</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=2136">Solomon Moffat</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=6485</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />
My name is Solomon Moffat and I’m a Quantity Surveyor working on civil road projects in the Caribbean. I’m really enjoying using Kubla so far, but I’ve hit a workflow issue and would appreciate some guidance.<br />
The Consultant wants to verify the earthworks quantities using the “old school” method: levels (or heights) at the LHS, Centre Line, and RHS every 5 m along the road corridor.<br />
In Kubla I can see the existing and proposed levels at any point by hovering the mouse, but capturing these one-by-one is very tedious and time-consuming.<br />
Is there a better way to extract this information – for example, generating a report or exporting section data at 5 m intervals – so that I can tabulate it for his checks and certification of quantities for payment?<br />
Any tips, workflows, or documentation links would be greatly appreciated.<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
Solomon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />
My name is Solomon Moffat and I’m a Quantity Surveyor working on civil road projects in the Caribbean. I’m really enjoying using Kubla so far, but I’ve hit a workflow issue and would appreciate some guidance.<br />
The Consultant wants to verify the earthworks quantities using the “old school” method: levels (or heights) at the LHS, Centre Line, and RHS every 5 m along the road corridor.<br />
In Kubla I can see the existing and proposed levels at any point by hovering the mouse, but capturing these one-by-one is very tedious and time-consuming.<br />
Is there a better way to extract this information – for example, generating a report or exporting section data at 5 m intervals – so that I can tabulate it for his checks and certification of quantities for payment?<br />
Any tips, workflows, or documentation links would be greatly appreciated.<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
Solomon]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Several layers at different heights]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=863</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=597">Newuser</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=863</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size">I would like to create a third layer in a drawing. The drawing already includes existing elevations and new projected elevations. There are also samples taken that show at different levels how deep you can dig before hitting bedrock.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size">Is it possible to create a model that shows how deep I can dig at specific points before hitting bedrock and load this data into a machine model?</span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size">I would like to create a third layer in a drawing. The drawing already includes existing elevations and new projected elevations. There are also samples taken that show at different levels how deep you can dig before hitting bedrock.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size">Is it possible to create a model that shows how deep I can dig at specific points before hitting bedrock and load this data into a machine model?</span>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dirt Compaction and Expansion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=860</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1766">pronto</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=860</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Howdy,<br />
<br />
Is there a feature where you can add a modifier to the cut / fill?<br />
I use an expansion of 1.2 on cut and compaction of 1.4 to fill. I have to pay/transport by loose yards and have to do the math all the time from the Cut &amp; Fill report.<br />
<br />
Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Howdy,<br />
<br />
Is there a feature where you can add a modifier to the cut / fill?<br />
I use an expansion of 1.2 on cut and compaction of 1.4 to fill. I have to pay/transport by loose yards and have to do the math all the time from the Cut &amp; Fill report.<br />
<br />
Thank you]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Increase Outline by #5 for Building Pad]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=859</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1766">pronto</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=859</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Howdy,<br />
<br />
I frequently have to determine outlines based on being larger than a design structure. Examples are a building pad needing to be 5' larger than the building on the plan, or a parking lot excavation needing to be a foot larger than the defined parking structure.  Is there an easy way to do this?<br />
<br />
Currently, I add measurements all over the place from the designed structure to whatever outline I need. It just takes more time/tedious than I'd like so I'm hoping for a clever solution.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Howdy,<br />
<br />
I frequently have to determine outlines based on being larger than a design structure. Examples are a building pad needing to be 5' larger than the building on the plan, or a parking lot excavation needing to be a foot larger than the defined parking structure.  Is there an easy way to do this?<br />
<br />
Currently, I add measurements all over the place from the designed structure to whatever outline I need. It just takes more time/tedious than I'd like so I'm hoping for a clever solution.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Export help]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=806</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1540">Caynan</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=806</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello I am new to kubla and was wondering if kubla has a export option where it gives you the whole projects net cut or fill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello I am new to kubla and was wondering if kubla has a export option where it gives you the whole projects net cut or fill]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Missing adjustment arrow from Slopes]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=728</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=973">Balance Design</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=728</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm adding a driveway to a grading plan, but I can't get the arrow to show up for the slope tool in order to adjust it.<br />
Does anyone know what I'm missing..... apart from the arrow!<br />
Thanks,<br />
Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm adding a driveway to a grading plan, but I can't get the arrow to show up for the slope tool in order to adjust it.<br />
Does anyone know what I'm missing..... apart from the arrow!<br />
Thanks,<br />
Mike]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How can I hide the featured surface?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=703</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=486">ropabon</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=703</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I am trying to add a proposed drawing and move it to match the existing drawing location, but I cannot see the pdf drawing because the existing feature surface is on top. How can I hide the surface? Please see the attachment.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/images/attachtypes/image.png" title="PNG Image" border="0" alt=".png" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=127" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot 2024-08-11 110734.png</a> (Size: 298.4 KB / Downloads: 39)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am trying to add a proposed drawing and move it to match the existing drawing location, but I cannot see the pdf drawing because the existing feature surface is on top. How can I hide the surface? Please see the attachment.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/images/attachtypes/image.png" title="PNG Image" border="0" alt=".png" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=127" target="_blank" title="">Screenshot 2024-08-11 110734.png</a> (Size: 298.4 KB / Downloads: 39)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Slab elevation]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=644</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1096">ismeldy</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=644</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi!<br />
Im new using the program, i try to put a slab elevation with the platform option on the proposed screen but it doesn't let me put the desire elevation on the building, somebody know how could i put a single elevation for a whole area?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi!<br />
Im new using the program, i try to put a slab elevation with the platform option on the proposed screen but it doesn't let me put the desire elevation on the building, somebody know how could i put a single elevation for a whole area?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Feature Copying contours]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=622</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1041">Nick Costa</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=622</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have made my existing surface successfully. The new features surface i made with the new proposed elevation was imported successfully but the CAD drawings received never had the contours entered so i took the time and manually entered all the contours and elevation points.<br />
I have multiple varying surface elevations for example the pond and ROW cuts and fills will be to plans minus the topsoil strip, however the road will be a -18" level. Unless i am wrong i need to make another featured surface for this varying level.<br />
I do not want to have to manually re enter all the new contours. <br />
Is there a way to copy the contours and points from one featured surface to the next?<br />
<br />
Any help would be much appreciated.<br />
Thank you,<br />
Nick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have made my existing surface successfully. The new features surface i made with the new proposed elevation was imported successfully but the CAD drawings received never had the contours entered so i took the time and manually entered all the contours and elevation points.<br />
I have multiple varying surface elevations for example the pond and ROW cuts and fills will be to plans minus the topsoil strip, however the road will be a -18" level. Unless i am wrong i need to make another featured surface for this varying level.<br />
I do not want to have to manually re enter all the new contours. <br />
Is there a way to copy the contours and points from one featured surface to the next?<br />
<br />
Any help would be much appreciated.<br />
Thank you,<br />
Nick]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[K3 Crashing]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=484</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 14:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=643">msullivan</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=484</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello <br />
I,m mike from Maryland, USA.                  <span style="font-size: large;" class="mycode_size">Way to go Brandon!</span><br />
<br />
My construction phase's: existing ground (-4" topsoil/not useable at compacted backfill), H.D.P. /mass grading (design ground elev. 2ft+/- above top of pre sited foundation elev., garage 1ft below gar. f.f. elev.), Finished grade (outline at fill limits, 3d contour lines, platform 3d polyline at 1ft below basement elev.)<br />
<br />
My software crashes continuously happen when trying to cut in a platform/basement thru finished grade &amp; thru into my mass grading surface. The idea behind our earthwork is to have a mass graded site at an elevation where when the contractor comes to cut in the basement and pour the concrete for the walls/foundation and the spoils from that work are then used to fill/final grade around the structures thus alleviating the need to remove excess earth. <br />
<br />
My thought is that the k3 software does not want to cut thru multiple surfaces?  <br />
<br />
How can i work around this dilemma? should i change when i add the platform, i've tried multiple different solutions to no avail, please help before i lose my mind!<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance<br />
Sully]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello <br />
I,m mike from Maryland, USA.                  <span style="font-size: large;" class="mycode_size">Way to go Brandon!</span><br />
<br />
My construction phase's: existing ground (-4" topsoil/not useable at compacted backfill), H.D.P. /mass grading (design ground elev. 2ft+/- above top of pre sited foundation elev., garage 1ft below gar. f.f. elev.), Finished grade (outline at fill limits, 3d contour lines, platform 3d polyline at 1ft below basement elev.)<br />
<br />
My software crashes continuously happen when trying to cut in a platform/basement thru finished grade &amp; thru into my mass grading surface. The idea behind our earthwork is to have a mass graded site at an elevation where when the contractor comes to cut in the basement and pour the concrete for the walls/foundation and the spoils from that work are then used to fill/final grade around the structures thus alleviating the need to remove excess earth. <br />
<br />
My thought is that the k3 software does not want to cut thru multiple surfaces?  <br />
<br />
How can i work around this dilemma? should i change when i add the platform, i've tried multiple different solutions to no avail, please help before i lose my mind!<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance<br />
Sully]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Earthwork]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=480</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=622">Ganesh Thorat</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=480</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
I'm Ganesh, works in a ground mounted solar filed. Which requires grading of large land (in order of 200 to 500 acres). I require to do earthwork at solar table levels. Basically need the spot level grading at every solar table level, such that my gradient will be within permissible levels (mostly below 8-9 degrees). Will that be doable using Kubla software?<br />
<br />
Thanks and Regards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
I'm Ganesh, works in a ground mounted solar filed. Which requires grading of large land (in order of 200 to 500 acres). I require to do earthwork at solar table levels. Basically need the spot level grading at every solar table level, such that my gradient will be within permissible levels (mostly below 8-9 degrees). Will that be doable using Kubla software?<br />
<br />
Thanks and Regards.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Image Not Uploading Properly]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=324</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=419">earthtechcontracting_</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=324</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
Our proposed plans are currently not uploading onto the existing site plan properly.<br />
<br />
When downloading the PDF plan it saves as one single plan, when it is uploaded onto Kubla its splitting in half as if they are two separate plans<br />
<br />
any advice?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
Our proposed plans are currently not uploading onto the existing site plan properly.<br />
<br />
When downloading the PDF plan it saves as one single plan, when it is uploaded onto Kubla its splitting in half as if they are two separate plans<br />
<br />
any advice?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Image export failed.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=52</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 12:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=63">Agrostis</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=52</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[When I try to export the existing ground conditions to produce and image, I get 'Image export failed.  Error details:  Object reference not set to an instance of an object'.  I don't think this has happened before but Windows recently carried out an upgrade which may have a bearing on this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When I try to export the existing ground conditions to produce and image, I get 'Image export failed.  Error details:  Object reference not set to an instance of an object'.  I don't think this has happened before but Windows recently carried out an upgrade which may have a bearing on this.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Feature Surface - Using Ground Levels Option]]></title>
			<link>https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=7</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=45">randallinho</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.forums.kublasoftware.com/showthread.php?tid=7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to run something by you if that’s OK<br />
I have a site that has a large area where we have to strip off 80mm but then add 150mm of new topsoil.<br />
The finished levels are to match the existing levels (before strip).<br />
 <br />
The approach I have taken:<br />
1.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Strip 80mm<br />
2.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Create Feature Surface – selecting Use Ground Levels option<br />
3.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Apply an offset of -0.15m <br />
 <br />
My question is, is my offset correct or should I have applied an offset of -0.07m (0.15m – 0.08m strip). I’m unsure whether the software works to original ground levels or ground levels after strip when using the use ground levels feature?<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just wanted to run something by you if that’s OK<br />
I have a site that has a large area where we have to strip off 80mm but then add 150mm of new topsoil.<br />
The finished levels are to match the existing levels (before strip).<br />
 <br />
The approach I have taken:<br />
1.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Strip 80mm<br />
2.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Create Feature Surface – selecting Use Ground Levels option<br />
3.<span style="font-size: x-small;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;" class="mycode_font">                  </span></span>Apply an offset of -0.15m <br />
 <br />
My question is, is my offset correct or should I have applied an offset of -0.07m (0.15m – 0.08m strip). I’m unsure whether the software works to original ground levels or ground levels after strip when using the use ground levels feature?<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>